Sunday, February 23, 2014
Rob's Rage Page: FCC Monitoring.... Uprisings....
Rob's Rage Page: FCC Monitoring.... Uprisings....: http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2014/02/21/fcc-announces-it-will-back-off-plan-to-monitor-newsrooms/ Yes, I realize the FCC has backed...
FCC Monitoring.... Uprisings....
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2014/02/21/fcc-announces-it-will-back-off-plan-to-monitor-newsrooms/
Yes, I realize the FCC has backed off from this attempt at this time. But that's beside the point.... What brought it back to consideration??
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2014/02/21/watch-greta-van-susteren-answers-proposed-fcc-questionnaire-for-newsrooms-and-nails-it/
Greta tells it like it should have been told by every news agency across the country that was involved with any questionnaire from the FCC. It's not a matter of information gathering since that is rather obvious according to broadcast content. It's a matter of trying to project influence and control.
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2014/02/21/white-house-not-commenting-on-federal-monitoring-of-newsrooms/
Not a surprising event with the White House.
But wait a minute..... Isn't the FCC a Federal agency?? Shouldn't, of all times, there be a condemnation of the FCC attempted actions??
Oh!! But of course....
There wasn't an incident involving a shooting of a black youth, the comment of a music star, the sale of illegal substances in various states, the name of a professional sports team etc....!!!
Those occasions, among others, are worthy of comment by a sitting president but not the actions of a Federal Agency?? Could it be any more obvious where the roots of this travesty run to??
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2014/02/20/meet-the-fcc-commissioner-whos-blowing-the-whistle-on-his-own-agencys-planned-study-of-newsrooms/
Another "whistle blower". How many from the last several years have come out, at one level or another concerning this administration??
How many voices crying "Foul" have to be heard before the acceptance of reality can set in??
The issue is, as I see it, that the attempt was even thought to be possible!!
And this is not the first time the press has been the subject to manipulation.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fairness_Doctrine
Removal of the Fairness Doctrine, in affect since 1949, from the backs of the press in 1987 assured political spin. Now there doesn't have to be a "fair and balanced" sharing of information, as Fox News claims to provide. But who is it that determines that??
http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB122990390599425181
An attempt from several years ago was made in trying to once again control how and what the press reported. I remember the amount of uproar from mainly Conservative media concerning the "fairness" being sought by Democratic leadership. This one event polarized my attitude toward Big Government even greater than anything previously encountered in my still growing political interests.
Obama did, in 2009, oppose the reinstatement of the Fairness Doctrine. That's a fair enough statement. But in my view, why would you want to force an opposing view of those media outlets that so obviously demonstrated gushing adoration without qualification??
Some differences now vs. the times gone by, is that there is a crumbling base of support within the ranks of the MSM. The rather lengthy honeymoon with the Obama administration has lost it's luster, and with it, the spin that once was.
With having that opinion, it's no surprise to me that a stance of No Comment has been taken by the administration. There can be no opinion offered from an administration seeing it's glory fade and is desperate to regain it.
Only the information consumer can decide what is right and accurate. But that also brings the requirement for the consumer to think and be educated in the truth, should they actually be seeking it.
In our information sharing environment, we have nearly limitless access to events around our world. But what we believe is subject to our individual abilities and desires to seek the truth, should we desire the truth in the first place.
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2014/02/21/battle-for-venezuela-is-being-fought-as-vigorously-online-as-in-the-streets/
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2014/02/21/ukrainian-protesters-agree-to-presidents-deal-to-end-crisis/
A movement is afoot in foreign lands to remove the very type of tyranny making similar impacts on our nation.
Admittedly, the level of destruction is not the same here. And with that in mind we must acknowledge, however, the promise sold to these countries began as some form of "Hope and Change" as was sold here. People looking for a leader in uncertain times are being faced with a harsh reality that a corruption and betrayal has taken place.
Betrayal by ones government, of a trust, takes many forms and is universal in it's reach.
We have felt this betrayal in the United States. We are not immune to the abuse of power and are feeling the results of a political malaise among a nation of disinterested voters. Being easily swayed by flowery words and celestial promises has become a hallmark of our society. But this observation is not the first I've made concerning this issue.
When the people of America decide they've had enough, we will also face such an issue of discontent. But I for one hope it doesn't come to that. I love my country and would rather see a transition of power without a struggle to force it.
Either Stand Up And Defend Freedom When It's Challenged, Or Sit Down And Shut Up When That Freedom Disappears Because You Did Nothing....
Hope My Rage Is Your Rage.... If Not.... I Welcome Your View....
Yes, I realize the FCC has backed off from this attempt at this time. But that's beside the point.... What brought it back to consideration??
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2014/02/21/watch-greta-van-susteren-answers-proposed-fcc-questionnaire-for-newsrooms-and-nails-it/
Greta tells it like it should have been told by every news agency across the country that was involved with any questionnaire from the FCC. It's not a matter of information gathering since that is rather obvious according to broadcast content. It's a matter of trying to project influence and control.
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2014/02/21/white-house-not-commenting-on-federal-monitoring-of-newsrooms/
Not a surprising event with the White House.
But wait a minute..... Isn't the FCC a Federal agency?? Shouldn't, of all times, there be a condemnation of the FCC attempted actions??
Oh!! But of course....
There wasn't an incident involving a shooting of a black youth, the comment of a music star, the sale of illegal substances in various states, the name of a professional sports team etc....!!!
Those occasions, among others, are worthy of comment by a sitting president but not the actions of a Federal Agency?? Could it be any more obvious where the roots of this travesty run to??
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2014/02/20/meet-the-fcc-commissioner-whos-blowing-the-whistle-on-his-own-agencys-planned-study-of-newsrooms/
Another "whistle blower". How many from the last several years have come out, at one level or another concerning this administration??
How many voices crying "Foul" have to be heard before the acceptance of reality can set in??
The issue is, as I see it, that the attempt was even thought to be possible!!
And this is not the first time the press has been the subject to manipulation.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fairness_Doctrine
Removal of the Fairness Doctrine, in affect since 1949, from the backs of the press in 1987 assured political spin. Now there doesn't have to be a "fair and balanced" sharing of information, as Fox News claims to provide. But who is it that determines that??
http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB122990390599425181
An attempt from several years ago was made in trying to once again control how and what the press reported. I remember the amount of uproar from mainly Conservative media concerning the "fairness" being sought by Democratic leadership. This one event polarized my attitude toward Big Government even greater than anything previously encountered in my still growing political interests.
Obama did, in 2009, oppose the reinstatement of the Fairness Doctrine. That's a fair enough statement. But in my view, why would you want to force an opposing view of those media outlets that so obviously demonstrated gushing adoration without qualification??
Some differences now vs. the times gone by, is that there is a crumbling base of support within the ranks of the MSM. The rather lengthy honeymoon with the Obama administration has lost it's luster, and with it, the spin that once was.
With having that opinion, it's no surprise to me that a stance of No Comment has been taken by the administration. There can be no opinion offered from an administration seeing it's glory fade and is desperate to regain it.
Only the information consumer can decide what is right and accurate. But that also brings the requirement for the consumer to think and be educated in the truth, should they actually be seeking it.
In our information sharing environment, we have nearly limitless access to events around our world. But what we believe is subject to our individual abilities and desires to seek the truth, should we desire the truth in the first place.
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2014/02/21/battle-for-venezuela-is-being-fought-as-vigorously-online-as-in-the-streets/
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2014/02/21/ukrainian-protesters-agree-to-presidents-deal-to-end-crisis/
A movement is afoot in foreign lands to remove the very type of tyranny making similar impacts on our nation.
Admittedly, the level of destruction is not the same here. And with that in mind we must acknowledge, however, the promise sold to these countries began as some form of "Hope and Change" as was sold here. People looking for a leader in uncertain times are being faced with a harsh reality that a corruption and betrayal has taken place.
Betrayal by ones government, of a trust, takes many forms and is universal in it's reach.
We have felt this betrayal in the United States. We are not immune to the abuse of power and are feeling the results of a political malaise among a nation of disinterested voters. Being easily swayed by flowery words and celestial promises has become a hallmark of our society. But this observation is not the first I've made concerning this issue.
When the people of America decide they've had enough, we will also face such an issue of discontent. But I for one hope it doesn't come to that. I love my country and would rather see a transition of power without a struggle to force it.
Either Stand Up And Defend Freedom When It's Challenged, Or Sit Down And Shut Up When That Freedom Disappears Because You Did Nothing....
Saturday, February 15, 2014
Rob's Rage Page: Practicing Occupation / Peoples Republic Of Americ...
Rob's Rage Page: Practicing Occupation / Peoples Republic Of Americ...: http://www.infowars.com/u-s-army-builds-fake-city-in-virginia-to-practice-military-occupation/ Practicing for being able to "quel...
Practicing Occupation / Peoples Republic Of America??
http://www.infowars.com/u-s-army-builds-fake-city-in-virginia-to-practice-military-occupation/
Practicing for being able to "quell" civil unrest within our borders may seem innocuous at face value. But then you would need to expand the view to determine the true nature of the basic results.
Riot police, trained to contain violent protests, can be traced back to the 1920s. There have been SWAT teams trained to deal with far more violent events with deadly force if need be. But now we are transitioning into an environment of militaristic force against Americans in a far darker scenario. That determination being in that the U.S. military is being trained for actions against it's own citizens.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posse_Comitatus_Act
The above linked document was originally intended to create a dividing line between Federal troops and local police. A document, in it's original form, was designed to limit presidential power in using U.S. military forces against it's citizens.
This was modified by then president George W. Bush in light of the events of 9-11. But were removed in 2008.....
But once again, with no outward force of provocation, this was again modified in 2011 by Barrack H. Obama. Of course the wording of this legislation is overly burdened with legal terminology and easily interpreted in several ways.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Defense_Authorization_Act_for_Fiscal_Year_2012
This legislation is fraught with open ended definitions that is argued to include All People of any nationality, including Americans. One of the greatest arguments is over the implication that even American citizens may be detained indefinitely, should an "emergency" be declared by the president.
Our meek society, in a political sense, is blindly allowing the powers in Washington D.C. to flex muscle at not just the Executive, but also the Legislative and Judicial branches that are contrary to all things Constitutional.
Our global society does demand greater vigilance and pro-activeness against the dark elements in our world that would gladly dance on our ashes. But where does that line get drawn between protecting the citizens of the United States and shifting over to the oppression of it's citizens???
http://www.libertyzone.com/Communist-Manifesto-Planks.html
So often we are challenged to know or understand those things which are contradictory or averse to our thinking. Those things which challenge our acceptance and ability to "co-exist" with those deemed to be our enemy.
Greater among those enemies is the Communist regimes sprinkled about the nations of our world. The thinking and indeed platform from this political spectrum is harsh and a polar opposite to the teachings of our Republic.
But with some research one can find our nation is already within the grasp of such teachings from the realm of Marx....
1. Abolition of private property and the application of all rents of land to public purposes.
Americans do these with actions such as the 14th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution (1868), and various zoning, school & property taxes. Also the Bureau of Land Management (Zoning laws are the first step to government property ownership)
Anyone listening to news broadcasts on a regular basis has heard of the stories of people being forced from their homes because of government regulation or "Imminent Domain".
2. A heavy progressive or graduated income tax.
Americans know this as misapplication of the 16th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, 1913, The Social Security Act of 1936.; Joint House Resolution 192 of 1933; and various State "income" taxes. We call it "paying your fair share".
Taxes.... Not much more can be said in regard to the overburdening of our society through taxation....
3. Abolition of all rights of inheritance.
Americans call it Federal & State estate Tax (1916); or reformed Probate Laws, and limited inheritance via arbitrary inheritance tax statutes.
The cost of dying and results of dying in America are strained even without the government stepping in and taking from us after a time of grieving.....
4. Confiscation of the property of all emigrants and rebels.
Americans call it government seizures, tax liens, Public "law" 99-570 (1986); Executive order 11490, sections 1205, 2002 which gives private land to the Department of Urban Development; the imprisonment of "terrorists" and those who speak out or write against the "government" (1997 Crime/Terrorist Bill); or the IRS confiscation of property without due process. Asset forfeiture laws are used by DEA, IRS, ATF etc...).
The interesting aspect of this part of Marx theory is the "rebels". This label can be used quite liberally.... get it??
5. Centralization of credit in the hands of the state, by means of a national bank with State capital and an exclusive monopoly.
Americans call it the Federal Reserve which is a privately-owned credit/debt system allowed by the Federal Reserve act of 1913. All local banks are members of the Fed system, and are regulated by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) another privately-owned corporation. The Federal Reserve Banks issue Fiat Paper Money and practice economically destructive fractional reserve banking.
Yep, the Federal Reserve pretty much says it all.....
6. Centralization of the means of communications and transportation in the hands of the State.
Americans call it the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) and Department of Transportation (DOT) mandated through the ICC act of 1887, the Commissions Act of 1934, The Interstate Commerce Commission established in 1938, The Federal Aviation Administration, Federal Communications Commission, and Executive orders 11490, 10999, as well as State mandated driver's licenses and Department of Transportation regulations.
How many government agencies can you count in regards to the government and regulations????
7. Extension of factories and instruments of production owned by the state, the bringing into cultivation of waste lands, and the improvement of the soil generally in accordance with a common plan.
Americans call it corporate capacity, The Desert Entry Act and The Department of Agriculture… Thus read "controlled or subsidized" rather than "owned"… This is easily seen in these as well as the Department of Commerce and Labor, Department of Interior, the Environmental Protection Agency, Bureau of Land Management, Bureau of Reclamation, Bureau of Mines, National Park Service, and the IRS control of business through corporate regulations.
More Federal Agencies that have been piled upon the American citizen to pay extra taxes to support. And of course these, and other agencies, being far beyond the intent of the Constitution or the Bill Of Rights....
8. Equal liability of all to labor. Establishment of industrial armies, especially for agriculture.
Americans call it Minimum Wage and slave labor like dealing with our Most Favored Nation trade partner; i.e. Communist China. We see it in practice via the Social Security Administration and The Department of Labor. The National debt and inflation caused by the communal bank has caused the need for a two "income" family. Woman in the workplace since the 1920's, the 19th amendment of the U.S. Constitution, the Civil Rights Act of 1964, assorted Socialist Unions, affirmative action, the Federal Public Works Program and of course Executive order 11000.
Just read through the commentary from the original.....
9. Combination of agriculture with manufacturing industries, gradual abolition of the distinction between town and country, by a more equitable distribution of population over the country.
Americans call it the Planning Reorganization act of 1949 , zoning (Title 17 1910-1990) and Super Corporate Farms, as well as Executive orders 11647, 11731 (ten regions) and Public "law" 89-136. These provide for forced relocations and forced sterilization programs, like in China.
Something most of you may not have been aware of. I'd encourage you to look them up......
10. Free education for all children in public schools. Abolition of children's factory labor in its present form. Combination of education with industrial production.
Americans are being taxed to support what we call 'public' schools, but are actually "government force-tax-funded schools " Even private schools are government regulated. The purpose is to train the young to work for the communal debt system. We also call it the Department of Education, the NEA and Outcome Based "Education" . These are used so that all children can be indoctrinated and inculcated with the government propaganda, like "majority rules", and "pay your fair share". WHERE are the words "fair share" in the Constitution, Bill of Rights or the Internal Revenue Code (Title 26)?? NO WHERE is "fair share" even suggested !! The philosophical concept of "fair share" comes from the Communist maxim, "From each according to their ability, to each according to their need! This concept is pure socialism. ... America was made the greatest society by its private initiative WORK ETHIC ... Teaching ourselves and others how to "fish" to be self sufficient and produce plenty of EXTRA commodities to if so desired could be shared with others who might be "needy"... Americans have always voluntarily been the MOST generous and charitable society on the planet.
Of course in the minds of the children is where the ultimate control is derived.....
Believe or not in the undermining of our nations foundations, there still remains the results of what those yearning for power and control over a disinterested people can be achieved.
Either Stand Up And Defend Freedom When It's Challenged, Or Sit Down And Shut Up When That Freedom Disappears Because You Did Nothing....
Hope My Rage Is Your Rage.... If Not.... I Welcome Your View....
Practicing for being able to "quell" civil unrest within our borders may seem innocuous at face value. But then you would need to expand the view to determine the true nature of the basic results.
Riot police, trained to contain violent protests, can be traced back to the 1920s. There have been SWAT teams trained to deal with far more violent events with deadly force if need be. But now we are transitioning into an environment of militaristic force against Americans in a far darker scenario. That determination being in that the U.S. military is being trained for actions against it's own citizens.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posse_Comitatus_Act
The above linked document was originally intended to create a dividing line between Federal troops and local police. A document, in it's original form, was designed to limit presidential power in using U.S. military forces against it's citizens.
This was modified by then president George W. Bush in light of the events of 9-11. But were removed in 2008.....
But once again, with no outward force of provocation, this was again modified in 2011 by Barrack H. Obama. Of course the wording of this legislation is overly burdened with legal terminology and easily interpreted in several ways.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Defense_Authorization_Act_for_Fiscal_Year_2012
This legislation is fraught with open ended definitions that is argued to include All People of any nationality, including Americans. One of the greatest arguments is over the implication that even American citizens may be detained indefinitely, should an "emergency" be declared by the president.
Our meek society, in a political sense, is blindly allowing the powers in Washington D.C. to flex muscle at not just the Executive, but also the Legislative and Judicial branches that are contrary to all things Constitutional.
Our global society does demand greater vigilance and pro-activeness against the dark elements in our world that would gladly dance on our ashes. But where does that line get drawn between protecting the citizens of the United States and shifting over to the oppression of it's citizens???
http://www.libertyzone.com/Communist-Manifesto-Planks.html
So often we are challenged to know or understand those things which are contradictory or averse to our thinking. Those things which challenge our acceptance and ability to "co-exist" with those deemed to be our enemy.
Greater among those enemies is the Communist regimes sprinkled about the nations of our world. The thinking and indeed platform from this political spectrum is harsh and a polar opposite to the teachings of our Republic.
But with some research one can find our nation is already within the grasp of such teachings from the realm of Marx....
1. Abolition of private property and the application of all rents of land to public purposes.
Americans do these with actions such as the 14th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution (1868), and various zoning, school & property taxes. Also the Bureau of Land Management (Zoning laws are the first step to government property ownership)
Anyone listening to news broadcasts on a regular basis has heard of the stories of people being forced from their homes because of government regulation or "Imminent Domain".
2. A heavy progressive or graduated income tax.
Americans know this as misapplication of the 16th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, 1913, The Social Security Act of 1936.; Joint House Resolution 192 of 1933; and various State "income" taxes. We call it "paying your fair share".
Taxes.... Not much more can be said in regard to the overburdening of our society through taxation....
3. Abolition of all rights of inheritance.
Americans call it Federal & State estate Tax (1916); or reformed Probate Laws, and limited inheritance via arbitrary inheritance tax statutes.
The cost of dying and results of dying in America are strained even without the government stepping in and taking from us after a time of grieving.....
4. Confiscation of the property of all emigrants and rebels.
Americans call it government seizures, tax liens, Public "law" 99-570 (1986); Executive order 11490, sections 1205, 2002 which gives private land to the Department of Urban Development; the imprisonment of "terrorists" and those who speak out or write against the "government" (1997 Crime/Terrorist Bill); or the IRS confiscation of property without due process. Asset forfeiture laws are used by DEA, IRS, ATF etc...).
The interesting aspect of this part of Marx theory is the "rebels". This label can be used quite liberally.... get it??
5. Centralization of credit in the hands of the state, by means of a national bank with State capital and an exclusive monopoly.
Americans call it the Federal Reserve which is a privately-owned credit/debt system allowed by the Federal Reserve act of 1913. All local banks are members of the Fed system, and are regulated by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) another privately-owned corporation. The Federal Reserve Banks issue Fiat Paper Money and practice economically destructive fractional reserve banking.
Yep, the Federal Reserve pretty much says it all.....
6. Centralization of the means of communications and transportation in the hands of the State.
Americans call it the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) and Department of Transportation (DOT) mandated through the ICC act of 1887, the Commissions Act of 1934, The Interstate Commerce Commission established in 1938, The Federal Aviation Administration, Federal Communications Commission, and Executive orders 11490, 10999, as well as State mandated driver's licenses and Department of Transportation regulations.
How many government agencies can you count in regards to the government and regulations????
7. Extension of factories and instruments of production owned by the state, the bringing into cultivation of waste lands, and the improvement of the soil generally in accordance with a common plan.
Americans call it corporate capacity, The Desert Entry Act and The Department of Agriculture… Thus read "controlled or subsidized" rather than "owned"… This is easily seen in these as well as the Department of Commerce and Labor, Department of Interior, the Environmental Protection Agency, Bureau of Land Management, Bureau of Reclamation, Bureau of Mines, National Park Service, and the IRS control of business through corporate regulations.
More Federal Agencies that have been piled upon the American citizen to pay extra taxes to support. And of course these, and other agencies, being far beyond the intent of the Constitution or the Bill Of Rights....
8. Equal liability of all to labor. Establishment of industrial armies, especially for agriculture.
Americans call it Minimum Wage and slave labor like dealing with our Most Favored Nation trade partner; i.e. Communist China. We see it in practice via the Social Security Administration and The Department of Labor. The National debt and inflation caused by the communal bank has caused the need for a two "income" family. Woman in the workplace since the 1920's, the 19th amendment of the U.S. Constitution, the Civil Rights Act of 1964, assorted Socialist Unions, affirmative action, the Federal Public Works Program and of course Executive order 11000.
Just read through the commentary from the original.....
9. Combination of agriculture with manufacturing industries, gradual abolition of the distinction between town and country, by a more equitable distribution of population over the country.
Americans call it the Planning Reorganization act of 1949 , zoning (Title 17 1910-1990) and Super Corporate Farms, as well as Executive orders 11647, 11731 (ten regions) and Public "law" 89-136. These provide for forced relocations and forced sterilization programs, like in China.
Something most of you may not have been aware of. I'd encourage you to look them up......
10. Free education for all children in public schools. Abolition of children's factory labor in its present form. Combination of education with industrial production.
Americans are being taxed to support what we call 'public' schools, but are actually "government force-tax-funded schools " Even private schools are government regulated. The purpose is to train the young to work for the communal debt system. We also call it the Department of Education, the NEA and Outcome Based "Education" . These are used so that all children can be indoctrinated and inculcated with the government propaganda, like "majority rules", and "pay your fair share". WHERE are the words "fair share" in the Constitution, Bill of Rights or the Internal Revenue Code (Title 26)?? NO WHERE is "fair share" even suggested !! The philosophical concept of "fair share" comes from the Communist maxim, "From each according to their ability, to each according to their need! This concept is pure socialism. ... America was made the greatest society by its private initiative WORK ETHIC ... Teaching ourselves and others how to "fish" to be self sufficient and produce plenty of EXTRA commodities to if so desired could be shared with others who might be "needy"... Americans have always voluntarily been the MOST generous and charitable society on the planet.
Of course in the minds of the children is where the ultimate control is derived.....
Believe or not in the undermining of our nations foundations, there still remains the results of what those yearning for power and control over a disinterested people can be achieved.
Either Stand Up And Defend Freedom When It's Challenged, Or Sit Down And Shut Up When That Freedom Disappears Because You Did Nothing....
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)