http://www.theblaze.com/stories/msnbc-panel-struggles-over-using-the-word-hero-to-describe-fallen-soldiers/
Yeah, this one has pretty much pissed me completely off. And really what I think is obvious to anyone that knows me and to those that don't, this is for you.
DO NOT try and find other less objective terms for describing those that have made the sacrifice, in finality and otherwise, of their lives and bodies for the service of our country!!! To question the validity of that definition of HERO causes me to question the validity of your very existence. Got that??
What sacrifice has been made by you or any of those that would associate themselves with you?? Have you made yourself an instrument of defense of anything but your opinion?? Do you really think that the term Hero is so inaccurate as to need revision??
Chris Hayes, and the rest of his questionable panel members have the opinion that the worthiness of the cause constructs the definition of a Hero. Because of their personal opinions in questioning the validity of the purpose, those killed in Iraq or Afghanistan are quite probably NOT Heroes!!
Is that to say that because a police officer may not be specifically placing his or her body between a criminal and a victim, that being shot in the line of duty makes the act less than heroic??
Does this also mean that a firefighter isn't a hero if not physically saving the lives of victims of a fire??
There is a never ending flow of audacity and flawed character from all directions. These flaws have contributed to the degradation and floundering malaise that has enveloped our nation. When considering the background and contributing factors, it's no wonder such ignorance is openly expressed.
Mr. Hayes and those sharing this twisted opinion would be better serving of our country by fading into obscurity and oblivion.
No comments:
Post a Comment
What you think about what I think......