The Blame Game... Don't Trash The Prophet... Not Optimal

http://www.nydailynews.com/sports/baseball/yankees/harper-yankee-admits-bombers-jolted-bronx-jeers-article-1.1187331

   Not a surprise here. Blaming anything on a poor performance besides those things which are truly to blame. Sounds like something we've been saddled with hearing for the last 3+ years doesn't it??
   There is a point when it becomes tiring to hear incessant whining and diversion of attention for the real issues at hand. Sure the Yankees might have been annoyed by their own fans turning on them, but they are supposed to be professionals and above that type of influence.
   Shouldn't the same be true of our hired leaders??? Those we elect to office should be above finger pointing and show the ability to accept blame, acceptance for the burden of responsibility for the performance of their duty.  
   Accept that which you, upon acceptance of the responsibility, have done. The same goes for our daily lives and our conduct in society. Courts today challenge the framework of such civility with their awards of damages and convictions in trivial matters of those who are innocent except for being trapped by greed of others. 
   But even so we have but to look into ourselves for the reasons we fail, or succeed.

http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/0dc31c1c-1936-11e2-af4e-00144feabdc0.html#axzz29mFvasoS

   So here is another example of an individual speaking out against a violent and unyielding religion. The Islamic faith is not one of acceptance of other faiths or beliefs. In the very least not allowing of ideas beyond those found within the Kuran (Quran) or professed by the supposed "prophet" Muhammad. 
   There is great evidence, when looked for, of where the "infidel" is to be put to death for any number of reasons, the least of which is speaking out against the Islamic faith and the advancement of Shariah Law. The violation, both physically and emotionally of women is basic in the doctrine along with the degradation to a basically "slave" status of women. To highlight only the flowery concepts of Islam is naive. 
   Research the true followings and teachings of Islam and the "prophet" Muhammad. And even still look into the life of Muhammad and research the example in the life of this "prophet" that the true Islamic believer follows. 
   Next question why the POTUS refuses to call any Muslim act of violence and Terrorist Attack and in particular that of the Libyan consulate??? The Rose Garden reference, by the POTUS on 9-12-12, to the Benghazi attack as an Act Of Terror is a short step in appeasement of the Muslim world. 

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2220241/Barack-Obama-Benghazi-attack-Mother-diplomat-criticises-Presidents-optimal-comment.html

   And even still, at the time of this writing, at least I personally haven't heard or seen the actual act proclaimed by the Obama Administration as an Islamic or Muslim Terrorist Act. The brazen and offensive stance taken by this administration to take light steps in the world to not offend those that they are, apparently, afraid of or in league with is in, and of itself, criminal.
   Armed Robbery.... Carjacking.... Rape.... Vandalism.... these, among others, are Acts Of Terror Mr. President.... The killing of Americans in foreign lands is not just a simple act of terror. But then, calling the killing of Americans by an Islamic Terrorist on an American military base in Texas was labeled an act of Work Place Violence. So it's no wonder the assassinations in Benghazi have been downplayed and minimized.
   Assassinations of Americans being called "not optimal" by the POTUS, even if in reference to the question by Jon Stewart is still unbelievable and yet again an effort by this POTUS to minimize and attempt to not offend the Muslim nations of the world. There is an obvious attempt to display conciliation and deference to those that would claim themselves to be Muslim.
    "....government is a big operation and any given time something screws up." This finishing part of the POTUS response is more interesting still. Once again, as being true to form, an excuse is offered as part of the response. The suggestion, whether real or perceived, that the Office Of The President Of The United States and any entity thereof is subject to a Screw Up At Any Time is unconscionable and reprehensible.
   How Dare The President Of The United States Demonstrate Such Open And Complete Weakness In A Public Setting?!?!? To suggest and even admit that our government is incapable of functioning from day to day without a possible SCREW UP is far more dangerous than any terrorist threat from any foreign country. 
   The bid has been made to coalesce to those that would control our nation. The invitation to take advantage of our weakness has been given. 
   And just so it's noted, a recent predator strike took out 7 supposed Al Qaeda suspects. In hearing the POTUS speak one would understand that this terrorist organization has been "knocked on it's heels" as it were??? Surely with an organization so weakened there wouldn't be nearly so many left to strike against. At most 1 or 2 at a time in the best of circumstances with such depleted resources.
     Irregardless, the continuing issuance statements and of policy that leads to a public view of incompetence is deadly for our nation and those that serve our nation abroad. If there be time left, and should it even be allowed, the removal of our internal threat, with one of our few remaining rights of voting as Americans, is at hand. Our nation can not afford the continuance of the current philosophy of minimization and capitulation to those that would harm us and obliterate the United States.

 Either Stand Up And Defend Freedom When It's Challenged, Or Sit Down And Shut Up When That Freedom Disappears Because You Did Nothing....

Hope My Rage Is Your Rage.... If Not.... I Welcome Your View....